The $$$ Maker Report 

Bi-Monthly Investments Newsletter by Karl Jung, CLU                                                           SEPT/OCT 1999

Gibsons office:  (604) 886-2691     Cellular:  (604) 760-9899      Fax:  (604) 886-3014            kjung@dccnet.com

 

 


RESPs vs. "In Trust" Accounts

Saving for your Child's Education

 

 

Parents and grandparents alike are concerned about making the best choices for their loved ones.  Savings can be accomplished in a number of different manners, but each product has its own set of advantages and disadvantages.  The adage "Buyer Beware" still applies to many financial products, and Educational Plans are no different.  Here's a summary of the major forms of financing a child's future education:

 

 

Pooled Scholarship Trust Funds

 

For years the Canadian Scholarship Trust Fund and the University Scholarship of Canada were the major players.  They accomplished this by allowing parents to contribute small amounts of cash on a monthly basis to buy "units" or shares in the Trust Fund.  Another advantage to consumers was that the principle was guaranteed to be repaid to the contributor should the child not go to college or university.  Criticisms of such plans were that some do not pay any interest back to the parents should the child not continue with his/her education.  The child was not guaranteed to receive the disbursement in a given year since only so much money was released per year.  There were restrictions on changing the beneficiary and determining exactly how much money was going to be available in any given year.  This form of funding has taken a lesser and lesser role in the overall total funding options available as time passed.

 

 

Self-Directed RESPs

 

Whether done through a broker, buying individual stocks, bonds or through Mutual and Segregated Funds, the new amended RESPs have become more popular.  Although the money can be used only for educational purposes, some of the principle and interest can be returned to the contributor should the child not go on for future education.  One downside exists.  If the child does not go to school, the grant must be repaid.  Based on how much RRSP room is available in the contributor's RRSP, some of the unused money can be transferred back tax-free, the rest is taxable.

 

The growth on RESPs is tax deferred until the child uses the money and pays tax accordingly in that year, otherwise it goes back to the contributor (or into their RRSP if room is available).  An annual limit of $4000 is available for each child and the contribution is not tax deductible.

 

One attractive feature is the new Canada Education Savings Grant (CESG), which adds up to 20% on the first $2000 annual contribution.  In effect, the investment will have a $400 contribution made on behalf of the government if you contribute at least $2000 a year.  Specific rules and ages exist for the grant.



 

 

RESP

 

 

In-Trust Account

 

Eligible for CESG

Yes

No

Annual Limit

$4,000 per child

Not tax deductible

No limit on contributions

Not tax deductible

Purpose

Post-secondary education only

Any purpose for the child's benefit

Contributor's access to income

May be rolled over to RRSP (subject to restrictions) or withdrawn in cash

(subject to tax plus surtax)

None

Tax Implications

Tax deferred on all types of investment growth.  Student pays taxes on withdrawn, usually all taxable

Dividends and interest attributed to contributor;  capital gain taxable in child's hands, usually at low rate

 

"In Trust" Accounts

 

Money is invested on behalf of the child and it belongs to the child.  An adult is the "trustee" making investment decisions, while a second adult is the contributor (also called the settlor).  The main advantage of these accounts is in flexibility, inasmuch as the money can be used for any purpose.  If the child does not go on to future education, the funds can be used to start a business, buy their first home, travel the world, etc.  There is no limit as to the amount of annual contribution.  One of the more attractive features is that the growth can be attributed to the child as long as it is capital gains.  Dividend and Interest income should be attributed to the contributor.  For this reason, equity Mutual and Segregated Funds are very popular.  The downside is that no CESG grant is available.

 

                                                                                                                                               

 

Which is Best?

 

The traditional pooled scholarship trust fund has lost much of its luster to the new RESPs.  I would choose a self-directed RESP over the pooled product.  What's better between the RESP and "In Trust" account?  Both are good, and ideally parents should use a combination of the two products.  If it is choosing an option due to lack of funds, ask yourself what is more important - the flexibility of the uses of the money or having the government top off the plan with a grant of up to $400.

 

 

 

 


Index

 

kjung@dccnet.com